Showing posts with label the unit circle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the unit circle. Show all posts
Monday, July 29, 2013
The top of the bell shaped curve
This is the bell shaped curve from x ranging from -3 to 3. Note that this is NOT the normal curve, the famous workhorse of statistics. In math, "normal" usually means there is something about object whose measure is 1. This curve has a highest point at (0,1) but the normal curve has an area between the curve and the x-axis of 1. (In math, we would talk about this as the value of the definite integral from negative infinity to infinity.)
While this is not the normal curve, one calculus related attribute it shares with the normal curve is that the points of inflection are at x = -1 and x = 1.
Here is how the curve compares to the top of the unit circle from -1 to 1 and the parabola y = 1 - x² over the same range.
The curve that is very close to the same shape when the bottom points (-1, 0) and (1, 0) and top point (0, 1) are lined up the cosine function. The bell shaped curve is shown in blue dots and the cosine function in purple dashes. The most they disagree by is about .00647, a little more than six parts in one thousand. Still, they do disagree and are not the same function as far as mathematicians are concerned.
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Rational points on the unit circle and the Pythagorean triples.
Trigonometry translated from it Greek roots means "the measure of triangles", most notably right triangles. The most important aspect of right triangles is the Pythagorean Theorem, usually stated as a² + b² = c².
The unit circle on the xy plane is given by the formula x² + y² = 1. There are infinitely many points on the circle and if you pick one truly at random, it will very likely be irrational, which means neither the x or the y be written as p/q, where p and q are whole numbers. The only way it is possible for a point on the unit circle to be rational is to have two fractions of the form a/c and b/c where a² + b² = c². For example,
(3/5)² + (4/5)² = (5/5)² = 1.
In Excel, I generated 26 rational points on the unit circle, the largest denominator being 1,105. As you can see, there are a lot of gaps, but you can make out the general shape of a quarter circle.
Here's what it looks like with 662 rational points plotted. You can still see some gaps, notably near the horizontal lines at 0.8 and 0.6. If all the rational points were plotted, and there are infinitely many, you would not be able to see any gaps with the naked eye or at any magnification. In math, we say that the set of rational points is dense on the unit circle.
But here's one of the goofy things about infinity. There are also infinitely many points on the unit circle where both values are irrational AND infinitely many points where x is rational and y irrational AND infinitely many points where x is irrational and y rational. Let me write those sets out.
Set #1: { the set of points on the unit circle where both x and y are irrational}
Set #2: { the set of points on the unit circle where both x and y are rational}
Set #3: { the set of points on the unit circle where x is rational and y irrational}
Set #4: { the set of points on the unit circle where x is irrational and y rational}
All four of those sets are dense on the circle, meaning that in any segment of the circle no matter how small, there will be elements from all four of the sets.
Here's something even weirder about infinity. Sets #2, #3 and #4 are all the same size of infinity, but Set #1 is a bigger size of infinity, bigger than the other three combined.
Tomorrow, we move from goofy facts about infinity to more practical math aimed at answering the question "Is climate change or global warming real?"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




